European Central Bank hints at PoW-based crypto ban by 2025

Must read

The ‘Brussels Effect’ wields real influence over US crypto regulation

The right to privacy is enshrined in many legal traditions around the world. In the United States, it’s protected by the Fourth Amendment; in...

Lack of ‘qualified people’ without more Web3 education, say academics

Australian blockchain academics and educators have called for more robust Web3 education in schools, preparing students for a world that will be dominated by...

Warner Music Group partners with OpenSea to create more Web3 opportunities for artists

The company stated that select artists can launch their NFT collections and limited-edition projects on their own dedicated drop pages. 1174 ...

Market manipulation claims will be hardest ‘nut to crack’ in Bitcoin ETF approval — WisdomTree

“We’re all kind of watching this and seeing what’s going to happen,” said WisdomTree's Will Peck on spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds in the...

European Central Bank hints at PoW-based crypto ban by 2025 European Central Bank hints at PoW-based crypto ban by 2025 Samuel Wan · 4 hours ago · 2 min read

The E.U.’s commitment to fighting climate change puts it on a collision course with PoW tokens.

2 min read

Updated: July 14, 2022 at 11:19 am

European Central Bank hints at PoW-based crypto ban by 2025

Cover art/illustration via CryptoSlate

The European Central Bank (ECB) blasted Proof-of-Work (PoW) mining as a significant climate change risk in research bulletin published in July.

As expected, the report specifically mentioned Bitcoin. However, it also raised issues with Ethereum, despite its transition to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism.

Researchers compiled estimated carbon footprint data on the above tokens and evaluated whether they undermine the E.U.’s commitment to fighting climate change. It then discussed policy options, including a 2025 deadline for “potential measures.”

Bitcoin and Ethereum are identified as environmentally damaging

Using data from various sources, including the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index (CBECI), researchers said Bitcoin and Ethereum mining activity combined uses more energy than individual “mid-sized countries,” such as Spain, the Netherlands, and Austria.

The data also showed that estimated annual emissions, as of May 2022, exceeded target greenhouse gas (GHG) emission savings for many Euro-zone countries.

The report acknowledged industry initiatives, such as Ethereum’s PoS transition and the Bitcoin Mining Council’s efforts to “decarbonize” and educate on the sustainable mix of energy sources used in BTC mining.

But researchers largely dismissed the last point because of unclear methodology, lack of details, and unreliable data. Moreover, although such initiatives were welcomed, the report stated they are voluntary while also pointing out a conflict of interest between energy consumption and network security.

Proof-of-Work ban coming?

The report mentioned several scenarios resulting from a potential clampdown on PoW mining. For example, considering the institutional money in Bitcoin and, to a lesser extent Ethereum, researchers said the financial sector is exposed to “transition risk.” Meaning, that the E.U’s “green transition” could affect prices, in turn, affecting institutions invested in these tokens.

It also referred to an outright PoW mining ban, citing previous drives to action this, such as recent initiatives pushed by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority and the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. In a further blow, researchers said certain crypto-assets are “highly unlikely” compatible with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives.

The report spoke of the debate among lawmakers on the appropriate course of action, citing the recent approval of the Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCA) framework on June 30.

MiCA did not enact a ban on PoW mining and was praised as providing a much-needed framework for the cryptocurrency industry. However, it set about several heavy-handed requirements, especially for stablecoin issuers, who must hold adequate redemption reserves and be limited to a daily maximum transaction volume of €200 million.

Commenting on the framework, Seth Hertlein, Ledger’s Global Head of Policy, pointed out that lawmakers snook in a backdoor PoW mining ban via a requirement to reassess sustainability standards in two years.

More articles

Latest article

The ‘Brussels Effect’ wields real influence over US crypto regulation

The right to privacy is enshrined in many legal traditions around the world. In the United States, it’s protected by the Fourth Amendment; in...

Lack of ‘qualified people’ without more Web3 education, say academics

Australian blockchain academics and educators have called for more robust Web3 education in schools, preparing students for a world that will be dominated by...

Warner Music Group partners with OpenSea to create more Web3 opportunities for artists

The company stated that select artists can launch their NFT collections and limited-edition projects on their own dedicated drop pages. 1174 ...

Market manipulation claims will be hardest ‘nut to crack’ in Bitcoin ETF approval — WisdomTree

“We’re all kind of watching this and seeing what’s going to happen,” said WisdomTree's Will Peck on spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds in the...

Judge orders SEC to turn Hinman documents over to Ripple Labs after months of dispute

U.S. District Court Judge Analisa Torres overruled the SEC’s second attempt to withhold the documents relating to former Division Director William Hinman, who...